Legal Opinion

Fowls v. Outcalt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1902No. 12,368PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Coffey district court; W. A. Randolph, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*353The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ellis, J. :

This action was brought in the district court of Coffey county by plaintiff in error to foreclose a mortgage given on the 3d day of February, 1890, by Mary E. Houston and James J. Houston, her husband, to the Globe Investment Company, of Boston, Mass., and payable at its office. The note which said mortgage was given to secure follows :

“Kansas City, Mo., February 3, 1890. $1500.00.
“On the first day of February, a. d. eighteen hundred and ninety-five, without grace, for value received, we promise to pay to the order of the Globe Investment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. McGuire, Scoggins & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Walter v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Campbell v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Catlin v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Brown v. Guaranty Securities Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Dickerson v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  5. C. A. Karlan Furniture Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API