Griffin v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
Each of the appellants was tried on stipulated facts and found guilty of unlawful entry. D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3102. It is alleged on appeal that the motions judge erred in refusing to permit appellants to present their defense of necessity to the jury, and that his denial of appellants’ motion for advisory counsel violated their Sixth Amendment rights, or alternatively, was an abuse of his discretion. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
On February 9, 1980, appellants Griffin, Snyder, McDonald and Rice, with others, entered St. Matthew’s Cathedral, while appellants Hombs, Moss,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Ali v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Swisher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Buckley v. City of Falls ChurchCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Shiel v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.