Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Fisher

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 17, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for preventing the plaintiffs, wrongfully as is alleged, from traveling across a lot of land owned by the defendant. There was evidence tending to show that the plaintiffs purchased a lot of land from the Aberdeen Realty Corporation by deed dated May 13, 1924. That deed described the land by detailed boundaries and as “being Lot No. 1 as shown” on a recorded plan dated September 25, 1923, (hereafter called plan B), and “containing 6279 square feet of land, all as shown on said plan.” The concluding part of the description was in these words: “The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Storer v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Temple v. BensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Flynn v. BourneufMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. White v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  5. Ralph v. CliffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Kerwin v. DonaghyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. McNeil v. AttawayArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Palmer v. NissenDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1966
  5. Jasper v. Worcester Spinning & Finishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API