Flynn v. Bourneuf
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is an action on a covenant against incumbrances. At the time of the execution of the deed, the land conveyed was liable to. an assessment for betterments, which was afterwards made and which has been paid by the plaintiff. It is not disputed that the liability was an incumbrance, or that there would have been a breach of the covenant on general principles. Carr v. Dooley, 119 Mass. 294. But the defence relied on is, “ that, a few days before said deed to the plaintiff was executed and delivered, the plaintiff and the defendants made an independent, distinct, and oral agreement, that in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Batchelder v. Queen InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Townsend v. WeldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- McCormick v. CheeversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- White v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
3Cited by19 opinions
- Durkin v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Johnson v. ElmenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Goode v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Armington v. StelleMontana Supreme Court · 1902
- Downey v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.