Legal Opinion

Starkey v. Starkey

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2007No. 06-256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] In 1998, Jeffrey Starkey (Father) began paying an extra $50.00 per month on his child support obligation in an effort to pay off the obligation in advance. Father stopped making payments in September 2005, when he believed he had a “credit” of approximately $4500.00 in child support. At a hearing on a petition to modify child support filed in January 2006, the district court had an opportunity to consider whether or not Father should receive credit for the over-payments. Ultimately, the court ruled that Father was not entitled to credit. This appeal followed, and we affirm.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  3. Whitman v. WhitmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Jevne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Horne v. HorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jerry D. Walker v. Jaci S. WalkerWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Keck v. JordanWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Willis v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Suzanne Ackerman f/k/a Suzanne OttWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Swaney v. State, Department of Family Services, Child Support EnforcementWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API