Legal Opinion

Simkins v. Barcus

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1951No. Appeals, 99 and 100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This action in trespass arises out of a collision between a taxicab of the defendant, Harrison Barcus, trading as United Cab Company, and a police ambulance owned and operated by the other defendant, the City of Philadelphia, which occurred shortly after 5 a.m. on January 4, 1948, near the center of the intersection of Broad and Arch Streets, Philadelphia. Plaintiff was a passenger in the taxicab and was asleep at the time. He was thrown out of the taxicab onto the street as a result of the collision, and thereby sustained personal injuries. His action against both…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fire Insurance Patrol v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Reilly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Weinberg v. PavittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Lamara, to Use v. AdamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Mashinsky v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of MacOn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. City of MacOn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API