Legal Opinion
Martin v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 27, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2023-2758Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-2758 (TJK) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In January 2024, Rowland J. Martin, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed his First Amended Com- plaint, which asserts three counts against Edward Bravenec and Torralba Properties, LLC, and three counts against the United States. Defendants move to dismiss on several grounds. The Court will dismiss the case because Martin has failed to show that the Court has personal jurisdiction over Bravenec or Torralba…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.