Legal Opinion

Flanner v. Butler.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

ActioN by A. J. Planner against Carrie L. and Henry W. Butler, heard by Judge E. W. Timberlahe and a jury, at April Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of New HauoveR County. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtFurches, C. J.

The plaintiff and defendant Carrie were married in 1885, when the plaintiff was only 21 years old and just out of school. Soon after this marriage, the plaintiff inherited about $60,000 upon the death of his uncle, Joseph Planner. This estate was received in money and bonds, and deposited by the plaintiff in the Wilmington Bank, of which his father-in-law,'William Larkins, was president. Soon after receiving the estate, said Larkins told the plaintiff that certain property on “Front street/’ in the city of Wilmington, was to be sold very soon, that it would be a good investment, and advised…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thurber. Whyland & Co. v. LaRoqueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Norton v. . McDevitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Faggart v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Lassiter v. . StainbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Waddell v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Spence v. . Pottery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Norcum v. Savage.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API