Legal Opinion

State v. Gilam

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The issue in this post-conviction proceeding is whether it is fatal to the validity of a guilty plea for the trial judge to fail to advise a defendant, in open court, of the constitutional right against self-incrimination.

Defendant had entered previous guilty pleas to two counts of armed robbery, one count of possession of a sawed-off shotgun and one count of assault with intent to commit murder. The trial judge “addressed the defendant personally in open court” and informed him of the constitutional rights that he was waiving and the significant consequences of guilty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. MacKeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rounsaville v. EvattTennessee Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  4. Housler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API