Creekside Associates, Inc. v. City of Wood Dale
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Creekside Associates, Inc. (“Creekside”) and Oak Park Trust and Savings Bank (“Oak Park Bank”) filed this Section 1983 action to challenge the defendants’ decision to reject plaintiffs’ property development plan. The defendants now move to dismiss which, for the reasons stated below, we grant in part.
I
Plaintiffs’ complaint sets forth the following allegations which we take as true for purposes of this motion to dismiss. Meriwether v. Faulkner, 821 F.2d 408, 410 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 311, 98 L.Ed.2d 269 (1987).…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Groenings v. City of St. CharlesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Long Grove Country Club Estates, Inc. v. Village of Long GroveDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Nyhammer v. BastaIllinois Supreme Court · 2022
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992