Legal Opinion

Groenings v. City of St. Charles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1991No. 2-90-1052PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

Plaintiffs appeal from orders dismissing their complaint for failure to state a cause of action and denying their subsequent motion to amend the complaint. The facts of this case, as alleged in the complaint, proposed amended complaint, and exhibits, disclose the following. The plaintiffs (Groenings) own approximately 80 acres of real estate located between, and contiguous to, the two defendants, City of St. Charles (St. Charles) and Village of Wayne (Wayne), in unincorporated Kane County. Both municipalities are non-home-rule units of government.

The Groenings petitioned to St. Charles for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Ogle v. FuitenIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Teter v. ClemensIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lagen v. Balcor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Talbert v. Home Sav. of America, FAAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Jespersen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. American Health Care Providers, Inc. v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API