Legal Opinion

Hannon v. Epstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

In an action for personal injuries, brought against two defendants, a verdict was rendered against the defendant Epstein, alone, for the sum of $750. The successful defendant, Robert Lent, now moves for an order directing the clerk of the court to tax a bill of costs in his favor as against the plaintiff.

The plaintiff is not entitled to a bill of costs against the unsuccessful defendant, Epstein, by reason of the fact that the amount of his recovery is less than $2,000, as provided in subdivision 1 of section 1474 of the Civil Practice Act. Therefore, section 1476 of the Civil Practice Act,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haniford v. SaferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Sullivan v. WagerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1931
  3. Sullivan v. WagerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ross v. Syracuse Transit Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API