Legal Opinion

Ross v. Syracuse Transit Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1948Published

1Opinion of the CourtMalpass, J.

These áre two actions to recover damages suffered by reason of the collision of a bus owned by the Syracuse Transit Corporation and an automobile owned by the defendant Anthony Gidari. The plaintiff Jenny Eoss was a passenger in the automobile of the defendant Gidari and suffered personal injuries as a result of the collision and her action is to recover damages for such injuries. The plaintiff Vincent Eoss is the husband of Jenny Eoss and his action is brought to recover damages for loss of services resulting from the injuries suffered by his wife.

The plaintiffs have recovered judgments…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haniford v. SaferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Sullivan v. WagerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1931
  3. Hannon v. EpsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. McKeever v. Central Taxi Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API