Legal Opinion
McNutt v. McComb
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided November 11, 1899No. 11,263PublishedCited by 48 opinions
Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This case depends on the construction to be given to the will of James Burke, deceased. The will reads:
“Item first: I hereby devise and bequeath unto my beloved wife, Lucinda Burke, subject to the payment of my debts, funeral expenses, and other expenses, all my estate, real and personal and mixed.
“Item second: At the death of my said wife, I direct that whatever may then remain of my said estate be divided between my three children, Margaret J. McNutt, Alonzo Burke, and Sophia Whitmore, and my grandson James Whitmore, as follows : One-third *26t…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Campbell v. . BeaumontNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Howard v. CarusiSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Gifford v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Benson v. . CorbinNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Markham v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Zabel v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Bullock v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Holt v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Dyal v. BruntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.