Chennareddy v. Dodaro
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered upon the briefs of the parties and the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(d). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s dismissal of the complaint and denial of appellant’s motions be affirmed for the reasons more fully set out in the memorandum filed simultaneously herewith.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Watts v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Old Time Enterprises, Inc. v. International Coffee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Dyson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Chennareddy v. WalkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Crisler v. Sedgwick County KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Barth v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Fay v. Humane Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Kurdistan Victims Fund v. Kurdistan Regional GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Raja v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026