Legal Opinion

Fay v. Humane Society of the United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 19, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-1893Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTINA PATTERSON FAY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-cv-1893 (RCL) HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are two motions to dismiss plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. ECF Nos. 5 & 13. Defendant Town of Wolfeboro, Carroll County, New Hampshire (“the Town” or “the Town of Wolfeboro”) moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) to dismiss plaintiff’s claims against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. ECF No. 5. And defendants Humane Society of the United States (“the Humane…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API