Legal Opinion
Field v. McMaster
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 24, 2009No. C.A. 6:09-1949-HMH-BHHPublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HENRY M. HERLONG, JR., Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 of the District of South Carolina. 1 Plaintiffs Arthur M. Field, Ph.D. (“Field”) and Kathryn Taillon (“Taillon”), proceeding pro se, filed a motion seeking a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) or, in the alternative, a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendants from “threatened prosecution of the plaintiffs.” (Mot. TRO 1.) In her Report and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- Abijah v. DennisDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Aiken v. LewisDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Alston v. LawsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- Alston v. LawsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- Anderson v. MangumDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.