Legal Opinion

Heintz v. Amaral

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided July 15, 2004No. 040368APublished

1Opinion of the Court

Agnes, A.J.

1. Introduction. This is a medical malpractice action in which the defendant has filed a motion for a protective order from the taking of her oral deposition testimony prior to a medical malpractice tribunal finding sufficient evidence to warrant judicial inquiry pursuant to G.L.c. 231, §60B. Defendant Dilley timely served and filed an Answer to the Complaint on March 30, 2004 and subsequently requested the convening of a medical malpractice tribunal on April 15, 2004. After the plaintiff noticed defendant Dilley’s deposition for June 2, 2004, Dilley filed this motion for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gugino v. Harvard Community Health PlanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Tibbitts v. WisniewskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  3. Rose Brodie v. Gardner Pierce Nursing & Rest Home, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Schell v. BirnbaumMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994
  5. Rogers v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API