Legal Opinion

American Chicle Div., Warner Lambert v. M/V Mayaguez

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided November 23, 1981No. Civ. A. H-80-1606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McDONALD, District Judge.

Came on to be heard defendant Southern Pacific Lines’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has sued defendant Southern Pacific Lines for damage to goods transported by defendant, a common carrier in interstate commerce. Southern Pacific Lines contends that plaintiff did not properly notify plaintiff of its claim within nine months of delivery, as required by the Uniform Bill of Lading provisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission. 1 Plaintiff opposes the motion on the grounds that defendant was not the initial carrier, and therefore is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Pathway Bellows, Inc. v. Robert W. Blanchette, Richard C. Bond and John H. McArthur Trustees of the Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. B. A. Walterman Company, an Ohio Corporation v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  5. Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Insurance Company of North America v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Tokio Marine & Fire Ins. Co., Ltd. v. KaishaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
  3. Sankyo Seiki (America), Inc. v. S.S. "Korean Leader"District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. United Tanners, Inc. v. Arrow-Lifschultz Freight Forwarders, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API