Legal Opinion

Bart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 15, 1953No. 11045PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

Philip Bart was indicted in thirty-two counts for refusal to answer that number of questions asked him by a Subcommittee of the Committee on Un-American Activities of the House of Representatives. Before or during the trial the Government abandoned twenty-four of the counts. Bart was convicted upon the first eight counts of the indictment. From that conviction he appeals. The counts, and the questions involved in them, require somewhat different consideration and disposition.

Counts One and Two rest upon questions described thus: “Whether the defendant was born under…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. OrmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Carlson v. United States (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
  3. Bart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Quinn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  5. Emspak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API