Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arlen of Nanuet v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1970No. Claim 39972; Claim 40099Published

1Dissent

Bbeitel, J. (dissenting in part).

There is no disagreement

that the award to the tenant is excessive and that a reversal and a new trial is required as to that claimant. There is disagreement, nevertheless, whether the tenant’s interest is to be valued on the basis that only the taking of raw land for a yet-to-be financed project is involved. There is complete disagreement whether the valuation of the land owners’ interest may be reviewed in this court, that award having been affirmed in the Appellate Division on an issue of fact supported by the evidence. Hence, as to the owners there should…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Banner Milling Co. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. 25.406 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  4. In re City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API