Legal Opinion
Romero v. Argentinas
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 27, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-3041 (AJL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiffs Antonio Romero and Claudia Romero (collectively the “Plaintiffs”) to recover for injuries sustained in international air travel aboard an aircraft owned and operated by defendant Aerolíneas Argentinas (“Aerolíneas”). Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air (the “Warsaw Convention”), 29 October 1934, 49 Stat. 3000, T.S. No. 876 (1934), reprinted at note to 49 U.S.C. § 1502, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337.
Currently before the court is the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Far West Capital, Inc. And Steamboat Development Corp. v. Dorothy A. Towne and Fleetwood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Campos v. Sociedad Aeronautica De Medellin Consolidada, S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
- Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment AgencyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Carroll v. United Airlines, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Bobian v. CSA Czech AirlinesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.