Legal Opinion

Parker v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1917No. 8277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from Campbell superior court—Judge Smith. August 10, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. Where land is bargained by the tract, a deficiency in the acreage can not be apportioned unless the purchaser can show that actual fraud was perpetrated by the vendor. Kendall v. Wells, 126 Ga. 343 (55 S. E. 41); Goette v. Sutton, 128 Ga. 179 (57 S. E. 308); King Lumber Co. v. Cowart, 136 Ga. 739 (72 S. E. 37); Montgomery v. Robertson, 134 Ga. 66 (67 S. E. 431).

2. Where, in a suit on a note for the purchase-money of land so conveyed, the maker of the note undertakes to have an alleged deficiency in acreage apportioned in the amount of the recovery, but does not allege and prove actual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kendall v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Pullman Co. v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Goette v. SuttonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Montgomery v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. King Lumber Co. v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Land Trust Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Decatur County v. PhilyawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Hurst v. Goldstein Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API