Decatur County v. Philyaw
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. August 16, 1920:
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “A traveler on tlie public highway, exercising due care, although he knows there is some danger in driving over a defective bridge, may recover for injuries thus sustained, unless the danger is obviously of such a character that driving over the bridge, in and of itself, amounts to a want of ordinary care.” Elbert County v. Threlkeld, 145 Ga. 133 (88 S. E. 683). The charge of the court, having followed this language of the Supreme Court, and being otherwise *703qualified and enlarged by a correct statement of the law relative to tbe burden of proof, the respective duties of the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pullman Co. v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TrammellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Elbert County v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Parker v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917