United States v. Soto
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDayis, J.
This is a criminal ease, and the appeal is taken by the government on a question of law alone, which was decided adversely to the appellant in the court below. The prosecution was founded upon section 2461 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, which declares that “If any person shall cut, or cause or procure to be cut, or aid, or assist, or be employed in cutting any live-oak or red-cedar *231trees, or other timber on, or shall remove, or cause or procure to be removed, or aid, or assist, or be employed in removing any live-oak or red-cedar trees or other timber, from any . . . lands of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. StoresUnited States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Florida · 1882
- Bustemente v. United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nettles v. LichtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Great Southern Lumber Co. v. Newsom Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- Overby v. BurnhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
- Casselberry v. Stair, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1938
- Fogo v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.