Legal Opinion
Aesoph v. Golden
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 14, 1985No. C0-84-1920PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment determining that in September 1978 the respondent loaned the appellant $15,000, that the appellant signed a valid promissory note for. the loan, and that the respondent did not make a gift of the money to the appellant. The trial court awarded the respondent $15,000 plus interest, costs, disbursements and attorneys fees. We affirm.
FACTS
In May 1978 Sonora Golden and Henry Aesoph met and began dating. Henry was a former cattle rancher and a business man, and Sonora was an unemployed widow. Approximately three months later Sonora’s mother…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. FitzimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Berry v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Gopher Oil Co., Inc. v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Connolly v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Sarafolean v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Blohm v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.