Legal Opinion

Meschi v. Iverson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 22, 2004No. 03-P-123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

A judge of the Superior Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for their New York attorney to be admitted, pro hac vice, to represent them in this action, and the plaintiffs appealed that order. Our review of the record persuades us that the judge did not abuse her discretion in denying the motion. We accordingly affirm the order.

The parties’ underlying dispute arises from the administration of a trust established by their mother, Loretta Meschi. The parties were named jointly as trustees of the trust until May 10, 2001, when Loretta executed an amendment to the trust and a *679new durable power of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Guempel v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. DiLuzio v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Merles v. LernerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Revenue v. Comcast Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. TremblayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Murphy v. OlsenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Glenn Wilder and Others v. President & Fellows of Harvard College and OthersMassachusetts Superior Court · 2026
  5. The First Liberty Insurance Corp. v. Rapid Flow, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API