Legal Opinion

Worcester v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 29, 2016No. 14-1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant, Springfield Terminal Railway Company (“Springfield”), appeals from a jury verdict awarding punitive damages to the plaintiff, Jason Worcester, under the whistleblower provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act (the “FRSA”). 49 U.S.C. § 20109. Springfield argues that the District Court gave the jury an incorrect instruction as to the standard for awarding punitive damages. We affirm.

I

On October 6, 2011, Springfield reported a leak of hydraulic fluid to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. At that time, the plaintiff, Worcester, was an employee…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wooten v. BNSF Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2019
  2. Pan Am Railways, Inc. v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. Logan v. B H 92 Trucking, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Maureen Davis v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  5. Smith v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API