Worcester v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARRON, Circuit Judge.
Defendant, Springfield Terminal Railway Company (“Springfield”), appeals from a jury verdict awarding punitive damages to the plaintiff, Jason Worcester, under the whistleblower provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act (the “FRSA”). 49 U.S.C. § 20109. Springfield argues that the District Court gave the jury an incorrect instruction as to the standard for awarding punitive damages. We affirm.
I
On October 6, 2011, Springfield reported a leak of hydraulic fluid to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. At that time, the plaintiff, Worcester, was an employee…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wooten v. BNSF Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2019
- Pan Am Railways, Inc. v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Logan v. B H 92 Trucking, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Maureen Davis v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- Smith v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019