Water Supply Co. v. Sarnow
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The complaint avers that in January, 1902, defendant Sarnow obtained a judgment against plaintiff for $84-1; that in May and October following Josie Sullivan caused to be served upon the secretary of plaintiff an execution issued out of a judgment theretofore rendered in her favor and against Sarnow, whereby she sought to levy upon and hold all property or credits in plaintiff’s hands due Sarnow; that plaintiff is ignorant of the rights of the parties to the proceeds of said judgment, and would be put to hazard if compelled to judge between the respective claims, and avers that it is willing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harrier v. BassfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Grant v. SheerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by1 opinion
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937