Legal Opinion

Priest v. Avent

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1959No. 41039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArrington, J.

The appellant, Bobby Carroll Priest, a minor, by his father, C. H. Priest, as next friend, filed suit for damages for malicious prosecution against John Edward Avent. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial court granted a directed verdict for the defendant, ap*205pellee Here. From this judgment the appellant prosecutes this appeal.

The record reflects that on July 16, 1954, the appellee Avent purchased a watermelon from the appellant which was represented to be ice cold; that the appellee carried the melon home, cut it, and found it to be hot; that he returned the melon to the truck…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coker v. Five-Two Taxi Service, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Life Ins. Co. of Ind. v. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Whitfield v. WestbrookMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Brooks v. Super Service, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Greenwade v. MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fowler Butane Gas Co. v. VarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pugh v. EasterlingMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Joiner Ins. Agency v. Principal Cas. Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Associates Discount Corp. v. McDadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Joiner Ins Agency Inc v. Principal Cas Ins CoMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API