Legal Opinion

Pyle v. Pizitz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1926No. 6 Div. 645PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Some of the counts of appellant’s complaint were in tort, others ex contractu; but this, under the statute, afforded no tenable ground of objection to the complaint, as a whole, since the cause of action alleged in each of the counts arose out of the same subject-matter. Code, § 9467.

The contract, for breach of which the suit is brought, was an original contract of indemnity by which appellee undertook to indemnify appellant, plaintiff, against loss by reason of any liens or incumbrances existing at the time on a certain leasehold estate purchased by appellant from one Rosansky, or by reason…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Copeland v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Bixby-Theirson Lumber Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Bissell Motor Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Curry v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Ridgell v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GaunttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Once Upon a Time, LLC v. Chappelle Properties, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Bridwell v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Ellis v. Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API