Ashton Harry Matthews v. State

OPINION

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, JUSTICE

A jury convicted Appellant Ashton Harry Matthews of assault of a public servant and assessed his punishment at five years’ confinement and a $2,500 fine. The trial court sentenced him accordingly. In his sole issue, Appellant conténds that the trial court reversibly erred by instructing the jury on a partial definition of “reasonable doubt.” Because the trial court did not reversibly err, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

At trial, Appellant properly and timely objected - to the partial' Geesa instruction. 1 The proper analysis of his complaint, then, is…