Legal Opinion
Lysaght v. State of NJ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 16, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-4817PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge:
This matter comes before the court upon the application of plaintiffs Dennis Lysaght, Michael Berardi, and the National Association of Teleeomputer Operators for a preliminary injunction enjoining the State of New Jersey and the Acting Attorney General from enforcing Senate Bill No. 511.
For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ application is granted.
I. Standard for Preliminary Injunction
Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes a district court to issue a preliminary injunction when the moving party demonstrates (1) a reasonable…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Richard T. Van Bergen v. State of Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey, Iii, in His Capacity as Attorney General of the State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Zelma v. MARKET USANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Szefczek v. Hillsborough BeaconNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Lutz Appellate Services, Inc. v. CurryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Waterman v. VernieroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.