Legal Opinion

Hartigan v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1900No. Nos. 12,267—(74)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $2,500 for personal injuries. - From an order, Otis, J., sustaining a demurrer to a portion of the answer, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the employ of the Great Northern Railway Company.

The complaint, in substance, charges that while plaintiff was at work in the line of his duty, prying apart portions of a locomotive engine, he inserted a wedge between such parts to keep them asunder, when defendant negligently removed the wedge, causing an iron framework against which the lever in use by plaintiff rested to spring suddenly back, whereby his hand was caught and injured. The answer alleges that plaintiff and defendant were in the service of the common employer; that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Leddy v. BarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Seither v. Philad. Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Ayer v. AshmeadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hunt v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HilligossIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Smith v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Hooyman v. ReeveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API