Reeves v. Tankersley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Error is assigned on a part of the charge submitting to the jury the contentions of the parties as to a bonus of $25 per month to be paid to Tankersley, “if things worked out all right,” and “if Reeves made good on the farm,” according to the plaintiff, or “if Reeves made good in a sawmill operation,” according to the defendant. It is said that a bonus is a gift which cannot be sued for and recovered if not given; and it is also contended that terms providing for a bonus were not pleaded, and that it was not shown that the defendant made good either in farming or in the sawmill business. Both…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McConnell Bros. v. SlappeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Rocker v. DeLoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. LainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lanier v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Lanier v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965