Legal Opinion
Lanier v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 27, 1965No. 41123, 41124PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
Special ground 4 objects to the admission of certain testimony and presents the following contentions: “That the same was irrelevant and immaterial and not pertinent to any issues involved in this case, and under the *877evidence produced so far, too general and too vague to be a proper question for this witness and for presentation to the jury.” This objection is itself too general and too vague to present anything for consideration. Greyhound Cory. v. Clough, 211 Ga. 574 (2) (87 SE2d 387); Isley v. Little, 219 Ga. 23, 28 (7) (131 SE2d 623); McBride v. Johns, 73 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Heinz v. BackusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Minnick v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Peagler v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- The GREYHOUND CORPORATION v. CloughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southeast Transport Corp. v. Hogan Livestock Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Black v. New Holland Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Touchstone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Lanier v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Georgia Power Co. v. RedmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.