Delaware & H. Co. v. Dix
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Action at law by Anna A. Dix against the Delaware & Hudson Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, District Judge.
Anna A. Dix, defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought this action against the Delaware & Hudson Company, plaintiff in error, defendant below, in her own behalf and that of her children, to recover damages for an injury caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant and resulting in the death of Walter Dix, her husband. The evidence in the case shows that Walter Dix, on January 4, 1908, at 10:40 p. m., was employed by the Erie Railroad as a conductor, and was riding in the caboose attached to a freight train of the Erie Company.
[1] The plaintiff offered evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Holbrook v. . the Utica and Schenectady Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. South Pork Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Rose v. Stephens & Condit Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1882
- Kansas City, F. S. & M. R. Co. v. StonerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Turner v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Noce v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Wallace v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
- Burns v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.