Legal Opinion · Dissent

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Bins & Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 1959No. 37806Published

1Dissent

Felton, Chief Judge,

dissenting. 1. The action here is predicated on the theory that the plaintiff’s offer was accepted by the contractor and that the two documents constitute the contract which was breached. The contractor’s order which the plaintiff contends was an acceptance of its bid, as it appears as an exhibit to the petition, was not marked “accepted” by the plaintiff. The original order as introduced in evidence showed that it was not construed by plaintiff as an acceptance but as a counter-order or proposal which was accepted in writing by the plaintiff. Thus, the cause of action…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lydia Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Monk v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Gray v. LynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Berry v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. ManghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API