Legal Opinion

AWINC CORP. v. Simonsen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 14, 2005No. 20030318-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant Rañdy T. Simonsen (Simon-sen) appeals from the trial court’s determination that an unimproved mountain road which crosses Simonsen’s property and leads to AWINC Corporation’s property (AWINC) is a public road under Utah Code section 72-5-104(1). See Utah Code Ann. § 72-5-104(1) (2004). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 AWINC and Simonsen own property on adjacent parcels in the Uinta National Forest. 1 Both properties are accessed by an unimproved mountain road (Middle Fork Road).

¶ 3 Simonsen attempted to block access to Middle Fork Road. In 1996 or 1997,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. Draper City v. Estate of BernardoUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Heber City Corp. v. SimpsonUtah Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands v. Six Mile Ranch Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  2. Monaco Apartment Homes v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Wasatch County v. OkelberryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  4. S and W Hunting Ranch v. FautinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API