Ray v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceConover, Judge
The majority affirms the trial court in each of these cases because both appellants failed to provide us with any record, reconstructed*1021 or otherwise. I concur in that result, but feel compelled to state my views as to the majority's holding a misdemean-ant's presence in court when he is arraigned, pleads and is found guilty thereof but only a fine rather than imprisonment is imposed by the trial court as a penalty are facts insufficient, standing alone, to start the laches clock ticking. I do not agree with that proposition.
The majority correctly notes when the State files an affirmative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Twyman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Frazier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Harrington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Morrison v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Badelle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.