Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ray v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1986No. 4-1083A353, 4-883A292Published

1ConcurrenceConover, Judge

The majority affirms the trial court in each of these cases because both appellants failed to provide us with any record, reconstructed*1021 or otherwise. I concur in that result, but feel compelled to state my views as to the majority's holding a misdemean-ant's presence in court when he is arraigned, pleads and is found guilty thereof but only a fine rather than imprisonment is imposed by the trial court as a penalty are facts insufficient, standing alone, to start the laches clock ticking. I do not agree with that proposition.

The majority correctly notes when the State files an affirmative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Twyman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Frazier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Harrington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Morrison v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Badelle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API