Legal Opinion

Harrington v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1984No. 1-284A61PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Paul Harrington appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Indiana Rules of Procedure, Post-Conviction Remedy Rule No. 1. We affirm.

FACTS

On October 24, 1975, Harrington, who was represented by counsel, pleaded guilty to exerting unauthorized control over a motor vehicle, 1 and was sentenced to the Indiana State Farm for one (1) year 2 with credit for eighty-two days served in jail. He has served the sentence.

Harrington contends the trial judge, at the guilty plea hearing, failed to advise him of the matters required by Indiana…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Twyman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Frazier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Henson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Mottern v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Stutzman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lacy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stewart v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Bivins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Kindred v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Wilburn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API