Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Kansas Employment Security Board of Review

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 14, 2017No. 115682Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 115,6821 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS JAY B. MULLEN, Appellant, v. KANSAS EMPLOYMENT SECURITY BOARD OF REVIEW, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When the statutory language is plain and unambiguous, courts should give effect to the express language of the statute and not speculate about the intent of the legislature. 2. If an individual lacks sufficient base period wages to establish a benefit year for purposes of making a claim under the Kansas Employment Security Act but satisfies the requirements of K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 44-705(g) and K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 44-705(hh), the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Ullery v. OthickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Hoesli v. Triplett, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API