Legal Opinion

Alberts v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1961No. Civ. 19503PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying relief against allegedly discriminatory assessments for the 1959-60 fiscal year on residential lands owned by the 105 appellants in San Mateo County. The action was brought in the court below upon the theory that the failure of completion of the reappraisal of the entire county was a discriminatory assessment practice. Relief was sought in the alternative as follows: (1) writ of mandate compelling the board of equalization to order the assessor to reduce the assertedly discriminatory assessments to the level existing prior to the increase; and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Best v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Lord v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Lilli Ann Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API