Legal Opinion

Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1985No. 69328, 69329Published

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Defendant (“Drexel”) appeals from the grant of plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment on the underlying claims and the denial of its motions for summary judgment on its counterclaims. The two cases are consolidated for purposes of appeal.

Plaintiffs Mr. and Mrs. Chapman had a brokerage account with Defendant Drexel for a number of years. On February 5, 8, 11 and 13, 1980, Drexel, upon Mr. Chapman’s request, sold a total of 3,663 shares of Multimedia stock. On February 11, 1980, upon Mrs. Chapman’s request, Drexel sold 792 shares of Multimedia stock. With the proceeds of these…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Hanover Insurance v. Nelson Conveyor & MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. CHARLES S. MARTIN DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Charles S. Martin Distributing Co. v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. E. F. Hutton & Co. v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API