Legal Opinion

Charles S. Martin Distributing Co. v. Banks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1965No. 41203PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

In a suit in trover, the denial of any paragraph alleging facts essential to the plaintiff’s recovery forms a valid, issuable defense; hence an answer containing such denial is not subject to general demurrer. Thompson v. Reese, 105 Ga. App. 826, 827 (125 SE2d 726). The defendant in his answer denied each paragraph of the plaintiff’s petition and the trial court did not err in overruling plaintiff’s motion to strike in the nature of a general demurrer.

To recover in a trover action, the plaintiff must first show that he had legal title to or the right of possession of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Hall v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Bush v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Hinchcliffe v. PinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. National City Bank v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Correria v. Orlando Bank & Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. McElmurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Simson v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Gilbert v. RafaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Locke v. Arabi Grain & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API