Legal Opinion
DET. & MACKINAC RY. CO. v. Mich. RR Comm.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 14, 1914No. 209PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
235 U.S. 402 (1914)
DETROIT AND MACKINAC RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
MICHIGAN RAILROAD COMMISSION.
No. 209.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 2, 1914.
Decided December 14, 1914.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.
Mr. Fred A. Baker, with whom Mr. James McNamara was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Edward S. Clark, with whom Mr. Grant Fellows, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, was on the brief, for appellees.
2Opinion of the Court · HolmesJustice Holmes
This is a bill brought by the appellant, alleging its railroad to be wholly within the State of Michigan and subject to the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. JasperSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bacon v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Calaf Y Fugurul v. Calaf Y RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Hunstiger v. KilianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Lewiston, Greene & Monmouth Telephone Co. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- City of Duluth v. Railroad & Warehouse CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Lehigh Valley R. Co. of New Jersey v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.