State ex rel. Carson v. Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The single question involved in this case is whether an action in mandamus is a chancery case, and hence appealable to the Court of Appeals within the provisions of Section 6, Article IV, of the Ohio Constitution, that:
“The Courts of Appeals shall have original jurisdiction in quo warranto, mandamus, habeas corpus, prohibition and procedendo, and appellate jurisdiction in the trial of chancery cases # *
Granting that the action in mandamus, as instituted, conformed to the requirements of Section 12224, General Code, the action has to constitute a chancery case in order that the appeal may lie.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Heine v. Levee CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Smith v. Bourbon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- State, ex rel. Beard v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Woods v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.