State of Iowa v. Deshaun Marvin Lamar Williams
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Dissent
WIGGINS, Justice (dissenting).
The majority holds the State is not required to prove it mailed notice to Deshaun Williams as an element of the offense of driving while barred. I dissent based upon my analysis of the statutory scheme and due process considerations.
I begin my analysis with State v. Green , 722 N.W.2d 650 (Iowa 2006). There we addressed the issue of whether the Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT) established it had sent notice-"the condition precedent to agency action"-to the licensee prior to suspending her license. Id. at 651. We first examined the general notice…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Auen v. Alcoholic Beverages Division of Iowa Department of CommerceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Janson v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- State v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State of Iowa v. Brian M. KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Rojas v. Pine Ridge Farms, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.