Legal Opinion

Kleindienst v. Mandel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 29, 1972No. 71-16PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

408 U.S. 753 (1972)

KLEINDIENST, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

v.

MANDEL ET AL.

No. 71-16.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 18, 1972.

Decided June 29, 1972.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Deputy Solicitor General Friedman argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Mardian, A. Raymond Randolph, Jr., Robert L. Keuch, Edward S. Christenbury, and Lee B. Anderson.

Leonard B. Boudin argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Victor Rabinowitz and David Rosenberg.

David…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Blackmun; Dissent · Douglas; Dissent · Marshall.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API