Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State of Washington v. Donald J. Trump

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 2017No. 17-35105Published

1ConcurrenceBerzon, Circuit Judge

I concur in the court’s denial of rehearing en banc regarding vacatur. I have full confidence in the panel’s decision. I write to emphasize that, although one would think otherwise from the three dissents from denial of rehearing en banc, judges are empowered to decide issues properly before them, not to express their personal views on legal questions no one has asked them. There is no appeal currently before us, and so no stay motion pending that appeal currently before us either. In other words, all the merits commentary in the dissents filed by a small minority of the judges of this court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Kerry v. DinSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Nadarajah v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API